<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for to turn widdershins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://widdr.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>what manner of tomfoolery is this?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on literally unprecedented by Willian</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/literally-unprecedented/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Willian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I read your posts at &quot;Microsoft TechNet&quot; about changing mac address in win7.
Any success?
Contact me by my website,
Thankz,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I read your posts at &#8220;Microsoft TechNet&#8221; about changing mac address in win7.<br />
Any success?<br />
Contact me by my website,<br />
Thankz,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on literally unprecedented by anwamehtar</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/literally-unprecedented/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>anwamehtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Connway, you&#039;ve installed it already?  Blog about it, too, I want to read what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connway, you&#8217;ve installed it already?  Blog about it, too, I want to read what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on literally unprecedented by Connway</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2009/01/10/literally-unprecedented/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Connway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Also remember, these are only BETA video drivers on a BETA operating system. This means that neither are at their full performance capabilities yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also remember, these are only BETA video drivers on a BETA operating system. This means that neither are at their full performance capabilities yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on black out facebook? are you serious? by Widdershins</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/black-out-facebook-are-you-serious/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Widdershins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Wow are you right. Overuse of commas has been a long-standing weakness in my writing. I have endeavored to rectify the situation. If you ever come back, try to criticize me again. This stuff is good writing practice.

Also, I know where you live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow are you right. Overuse of commas has been a long-standing weakness in my writing. I have endeavored to rectify the situation. If you ever come back, try to criticize me again. This stuff is good writing practice.</p>
<p>Also, I know where you live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on black out facebook? are you serious? by Concerned Citizen</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/black-out-facebook-are-you-serious/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ohh… fine, I’ll forgive their grammar&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But who will forgive your abuse of commas?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ok, actually, before I begin, I want to point out&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Ohh… fine, I’ll forgive their grammar</i></p></blockquote>
<p>But who will forgive your abuse of commas?</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Ok, actually, before I begin, I want to point out</i></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on danger: technical stuff about the future! by Widdershins</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/danger-technical-stuff-about-the-future/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Widdershins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Woah, hold on. That&#039;s going too far. 16 cores for consumer use might SEEM pointless RIGHT NOW--but call me back in 2 years and tell me what you think then.

Processor speed has hit something of a practical barrier. More cores are the way the future is going: looking ahead, massively multicore is the way it&#039;s going to be.

Sure you might say that it&#039;s REALLY expensive to add ram to a processor die. You&#039;re missing the point. Currently, processor cache exists in the form of SRAM, which is really fast and has no refresh time but isn&#039;t very dense at 6 transistors per bit. DRAM, on the other hand, has far fewer components and is far more dense on the die. The idea behind putting DRAM on CPU dies is that it gives you a large cache very nearby: just stick 256MB adjacent to the computational part and you&#039;ve got a really nice L3 cache.

And to finish up, yes. Technology is unstoppable, and architecture will probably change significantly, ushering in the age of massive multicore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, hold on. That&#8217;s going too far. 16 cores for consumer use might SEEM pointless RIGHT NOW&#8211;but call me back in 2 years and tell me what you think then.</p>
<p>Processor speed has hit something of a practical barrier. More cores are the way the future is going: looking ahead, massively multicore is the way it&#8217;s going to be.</p>
<p>Sure you might say that it&#8217;s REALLY expensive to add ram to a processor die. You&#8217;re missing the point. Currently, processor cache exists in the form of SRAM, which is really fast and has no refresh time but isn&#8217;t very dense at 6 transistors per bit. DRAM, on the other hand, has far fewer components and is far more dense on the die. The idea behind putting DRAM on CPU dies is that it gives you a large cache very nearby: just stick 256MB adjacent to the computational part and you&#8217;ve got a really nice L3 cache.</p>
<p>And to finish up, yes. Technology is unstoppable, and architecture will probably change significantly, ushering in the age of massive multicore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on danger: technical stuff about the future! by Connway</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/danger-technical-stuff-about-the-future/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Connway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I agree that 16 cores for *consumer* use is going to be pointless. There isn&#039;t any normal application(s) out there that are going to need the power of 16 cores to pump data through. Unless you want to be a crazy F@H powerhouse and/or do nothing but huge calculations with your processor, it&#039;s not necessary.

The main point the article seemed to be making was that the data bus of modern motherboards aren&#039;t speeding up at a similar rate as the processors. Technically, they would be right, the data bus would cause a bottleneck, greatly reducing performance, but I highly doubt manufacturers would be stupid enough to let that happen.

You also need to take into consideration, adding on-board &quot;RAM&quot; (or registers) to your processor is REALLY expensive. Those memory registers are exponentially more expensive than the RAM you buy and stick in yourself on your motherboard. However, they are very fast.

You are right though, technology will never stop. It will always move forward. If they can&#039;t make the current architecture powerful enough to allow for faster data rates, they will make a new one. Although, you have to look at that IEEE chart and notice one thing, that is with &quot;conventional architecture.&quot; It is quite possible it is architecture that was not designed work as efficiently as possible when linked together 64 times. I&#039;m pretty sure we&#039;re not going to be using &quot;conventional architecture&quot; in the future. We will have a new architecture to suite the needs/demands of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that 16 cores for *consumer* use is going to be pointless. There isn&#8217;t any normal application(s) out there that are going to need the power of 16 cores to pump data through. Unless you want to be a crazy F@H powerhouse and/or do nothing but huge calculations with your processor, it&#8217;s not necessary.</p>
<p>The main point the article seemed to be making was that the data bus of modern motherboards aren&#8217;t speeding up at a similar rate as the processors. Technically, they would be right, the data bus would cause a bottleneck, greatly reducing performance, but I highly doubt manufacturers would be stupid enough to let that happen.</p>
<p>You also need to take into consideration, adding on-board &#8220;RAM&#8221; (or registers) to your processor is REALLY expensive. Those memory registers are exponentially more expensive than the RAM you buy and stick in yourself on your motherboard. However, they are very fast.</p>
<p>You are right though, technology will never stop. It will always move forward. If they can&#8217;t make the current architecture powerful enough to allow for faster data rates, they will make a new one. Although, you have to look at that IEEE chart and notice one thing, that is with &#8220;conventional architecture.&#8221; It is quite possible it is architecture that was not designed work as efficiently as possible when linked together 64 times. I&#8217;m pretty sure we&#8217;re not going to be using &#8220;conventional architecture&#8221; in the future. We will have a new architecture to suite the needs/demands of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on request by taly</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/request/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>taly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/request/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>oh so this is your blog.

All right, find out how you could ever get purple eyes. Are they genetic? a half-albino trait? a mythical (?!) disease? (&quot;Alexandria&#039;s Genesis&quot;) Oh, and Elizabeth Taylor doesn&#039;t count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh so this is your blog.</p>
<p>All right, find out how you could ever get purple eyes. Are they genetic? a half-albino trait? a mythical (?!) disease? (&#8220;Alexandria&#8217;s Genesis&#8221;) Oh, and Elizabeth Taylor doesn&#8217;t count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the horror by Shōin</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/the-horror/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Shōin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 03:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hm... if only preploding didn&#039;t disrupt the Pattern, there would be oh so many things to do before christmas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; if only preploding didn&#8217;t disrupt the Pattern, there would be oh so many things to do before christmas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the horror by Connway</title>
		<link>http://widdr.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/the-horror/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Connway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://widdr.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Asplode, remind me of that one SBEmail where Strong Bad is designing a video game and the floating head that has bad grammar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asplode, remind me of that one SBEmail where Strong Bad is designing a video game and the floating head that has bad grammar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
